STAKEHOLDER
GROUP |
NOTES |
ASSIGNED |
IMPACT/
RECOURSE |
DESIRED OUTCOME |
DEMAND FOR PROGRAM |
PRIORITIES/ ENABLERS |
CONCERNS/ BARRIERS |
VALUE PROPOSITION |
STRATEGY FOR ACTION |
| Who are the people who will be affected by what we want to do? |
|
Who will draft notes for this row in our table? |
How can this group affect, positively or otherwise, what we want to do? |
What specifically do we want this group to do with regard to our initiative? |
What did they say they were interested in during initial meetings?
|
What is important to these stakeholders?
What other factors might enable these stakeholders' participation? |
What are these stakeholders worried about?
What other factors might inhibit these stakeholders' participation? |
Does what we're doing offer any specific benefit(s) to this group? |
What do we plan to do to influence/ achieve the desired outcome? |
Women released from prison |
|
|
Clients are critical to our effort. |
Become successful citizens. Support each other. Respect each other and the program. |
|
Safety. Shelter. Hope. |
Returning to... |
Improve probability of successful re-entry, life. |
Design and execute an effective program. |
Alaska Dept. of Corrections -- Lori Varick, 465-3067, is contact person for Serious and Violent Offender Re-Entry Initiative |
|
Larry |
Their support is critical. They may or may not be a funding source, but they are almost certainly going to be influential with any funders. We need their acceptance. |
Promote our program with prospective clients before release. Write letters endorsing our program for grant applications. Coordinate with respect to client referrals. Possibly grant us money. |
|
Compliance with terms of release (parole, etc.) Successful re-entry, reduced recidivism. |
|
|
Engage them in our planning and periodic reviews. |
Alaska Dept. of Health and Social Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gastineau Human Services Corporation -- see Re-entry Resources and Seventh Step Residential Program |
I contacted Allen Hulet of Juneau House... but still need to talk to others. |
Larry |
They have experience and skills that could be very helpful to our program. They also have credibility and will be influential with funders and other partners. We need their acceptance. |
Promote our program with prospective clients before release. Write letters endorsing our program for grant applications. Coordinate with respect to client referrals. |
|
Successful re-entry. |
Competition, overlapping services. |
|
Invite them to engage in our planning and periodic reviews. |
Catholic Community Services of Juneau Family Resource Center 463-6180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juneau Alliance for the Mentally Ill |
|
Larry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBJ Mayor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justice Center , University of Alaska Anchorage, (907) 786-1810, ayjust@uaa.alaska.edu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Force for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC
Jana.Hoisington@usdoj.gov
202.514.2987 |
|
Larry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fortune Society
29-76 Northern Boulevard
Long Island City, NY 11101
212-691-7554 (telephone)
347-510-3451 (fax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska Coalition for Prisoner Re-entry (AKCPR)
Contact Jana Chatham |
|
Talitha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chaplin Inch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska Correctional Ministries |
Lori contacted Susan Marhaller and received enthusiastic support. |
Lori |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juneau Economic Development Council |
Ramona contacted Scott Ciambor and received enthusiastic support. |
Ramona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority |
|
Larry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Love INC |
|
Talitha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tlingit-Haida Central Council |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Senators Dennis Egan and Hollis French, and Representatives Beth Kerttula and Cathy Engstrom Munoz |
I have made initial contact with each of these by email. Need to follow-up as we have more specific plans. |
Larry |
Their support is critical. They may be a funding source, they are certainly going to be influential with any funders. We need their support. |
Endorse our program. Possibly grant us money. |
|
Successful re-entry, reduced recidivism. |
Overlapping services, ineffective program, religious intolerance. |
Successful re-entry saves public funds. Faith-based programs have good success rate. |
Communicate regularly. |